Perks of Being a Wallflower: The Lifeline They Want Gone
Stephen Chbosky wrote a novel about a teenager surviving depression, trauma, and high school. Sixty-seven Texas districts decided this was too dangerous for students to read. Mental health professionals call it a lifeline. Republicans call it inappropriate.
The Perks of Being a Wallflower commits several unforgivable sins in the eyes of conservative censors. It portrays mental health treatment positively. It shows gay characters as normal people. It acknowledges that teenagers have sex. It suggests that therapy can help trauma survivors heal.
These revelations are apparently too radical for American high school students.
The book follows Charlie, a sensitive teenager navigating depression, processing childhood sexual abuse, and finding his place in the world. He discovers that mental illness is treatable, that different kinds of people deserve acceptance, and that authentic relationships can heal emotional wounds.
For many teenage readers, these are revolutionary concepts.
Research consistently shows the book's positive mental health impact. Sixty-seven percent of readers report feeling less isolated after reading it. Forty-three percent are more likely to seek therapy. Trauma survivors use it to recognize and process their own experiences.
But these outcomes apparently concern Republican challengers more than teenage suicide rates or untreated depression.
The specific objections reveal telling priorities. LGBTQ characters are problematic. Teen sexuality must remain invisible. Mental health treatment should stay stigmatized. Diversity acceptance threatens something undefined but apparently important.
Consider the alternative these censors prefer: teenage isolation, untreated trauma, stigmatized mental health care, and silence about sexual abuse. This is what they're actively promoting through book challenges.
The timing matters. American teenagers are experiencing unprecedented mental health crises. Suicide rates are climbing. Depression diagnoses are surging. Anxiety disorders are becoming normal rather than exceptional.
Republican response: remove books that help teenagers understand and address these problems.
Chbosky wrote the novel specifically to reach isolated and struggling teenagers. He wanted to show them that depression is treatable, trauma is survivable, and therapy can help. The book serves as mental health intervention disguised as coming-of-age literature.
This is precisely why conservatives want it banned.
The challenges follow predictable geographic patterns. Texas leads with sixty-seven districts reviewing or restricting the book. Florida opened a state investigation. Alabama removed it from multiple school libraries. The usual suspects pursuing the usual agendas.
Meanwhile, mental health professionals recommend the book to teenage patients. Therapists use it to start conversations about trauma and recovery. Counselors give it to isolated students who need to know they're not alone.
But apparently these professionals know less about teenage mental health than school board members and angry parents.
The international recognition tells a different story. The book has been translated into forty languages. Mental health organizations worldwide use it in educational campaigns. The film adaptation reached millions more teenagers who needed its message.
Only in America is a mental health resource considered dangerous contraband.
Teen testimonials are consistently positive. Readers credit the book with showing them that depression was treatable, helping them recognize abuse, teaching them that being LGBTQ was acceptable, and providing hope during dark periods.
These are the outcomes Republican censors want to prevent.
The broader pattern emerges clearly. Conservatives are systematically removing mental health resources from schools while opposing therapy access for minors, defunding counseling programs, and stigmatizing psychological treatment.
It's almost as if they prefer teenagers to remain isolated, traumatized, and uninformed about mental health resources.
The Perks of Being a Wallflower offers something invaluable to struggling teenagers: the knowledge that they're not alone, that help is available, and that recovery is possible. Every challenge to the book isolates vulnerable young people who desperately need these messages.
Sometimes the cruelty is the point. Sometimes the suffering is the strategy.